Getty Images drops copyright allegations against UK-based AI firm

Staff
By Staff

Getty Images has dropped a key part of its legal action against a UK-based artificial intelligence firm over alleged copyright infringement. The visual content company, based in the United States, was suing Stability AI Limited at the High Court, claiming it scraped millions of images from Getty’s websites without consent to unlawfully train its deep learning AI model, Stable Diffusion.

The landmark case has been closely watched by the creative and technology industries. Getty made the “pragmatic decision” to drop the copyright infringement allegations, and “pursue only the claims for trade mark infringement, passing off and secondary infringement of copyright,” according to a written copy of its closing arguments submitted on Wednesday.

But the company continues to accuse Stability of infringing its trademark and indirectly infringing its copyright. London-based Stability AI opposed the copyright claim, which it told the court represented “an overt threat” to its business.

A spokesperson for the company said: “We are pleased to see Getty’s decision to drop multiple claims after the conclusion of testimony. We are grateful for the time and effort the UK court has put forth to address the important matters in this case. We look forward to the court’s final judgment.”

In a judgment in May concerning preliminary matters before the trial, Mrs Justice Joanna Smith said that the case was “highly complex and technical” and raised “numerous novel issues for consideration by the court”. She added that the court had had to “devote unprecedented amounts of court time” to deal with the case.

In June, Lindsay Lane KC, for Getty, told the court the company “recognises that the AI industry overall may be a force for good”, but that did not justify AI companies “riding roughshod over intellectual property rights”. Ms Lane told the court Stability “did not care” if it used works that were copyrighted, had watermarks or if they “were not suitable for work or pornographic”.

Hugo Cuddigan KC, for Stability AI, said in written submissions that the case concerns “an issue of real societal significance” related to AI technology and copyright law, adding that Getty “appear to see generative AI as an existential threat”. A written decision from the judge is expected at a later date.

MyLondon is bringing you the latest on court and crime incidents and you can sign up to get the stories sent straight to your phone. Through the app, we’ll send you exclusives from court, breaking news and other crime related updates in our Crimewatch Community..

To join our community, you need to already have WhatsApp. All you need to do is click this link and select ‘join community’.

No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the MyLondon team.

We also treat our subscribers to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. To unsubscribe, click on the name at the top of your screen and choose ‘exit group’. If you’re curious, you can read our privacy notice.

Click here to sign up for WhatsApp alerts.

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *