Queen Elizabeth ‘wasn’t overly enthusiastic’ about change to Princess Charlotte’s life

Staff
By Staff

A new tell-all book has revealed how the late Queen Elizabeth and King Charles reacted to a major change that altered the future of the Firm forever when new legislation was introduced in 2013

BERLIN, GERMANY - JUNE 24:  Queen Elizabeth II arrives for the state banquet in her honour at Schloss Bellevue palace on the second of the royal couple's four-day visit to Germany on June 24, 2015 in Berlin, Germany. The Queen and Prince Philip are scheduled to visit Berlin, Frankfurt and the concentration camp memorial at Bergen-Belsen during their trip, which is their first to Germany since 2004.  (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)
Queen Elizabeth was reportedly less than pleased over a reform change that would change the Firm forever(Image: Sean Gallup, Getty Images)

An explosive new book has claimed that the late Queen Elizabeth was not “overly enthusiastic” about a major change to the rules of the royal succession.

The Succession to the Crown Act 2013 welcomed in a new era of the Firm, changing the rules of succession from male-preference ascension to absolute primogeniture, meaning birth order, not gender, determined succession for those born after October 2011, with the eldest child inheriting the throne regardless of gender.

According to Valentine Low’s new book, titled Power and the Palace: The Inside Story of the Monarchy and 10 Downing Street, neither Queen Elizabeth, King Charles nor aides at Buckingham Palace showed any great eagerness on the reform.

READ MORE: Former royal butler likens Prince William and Kate Middleton to other iconic royal coupleREAD MORE: Meghan Markle ignores bad Netflix reviews with celebratory behind-the-scenes post

Prince George, Prince Louis and Princess Charlotte during Trooping the Colour on June 02, 2022 in London, England
Prince George, Prince Louis and Princess Charlotte during Trooping the Colour on June 02, 2022 in London, England(Image: Karwai Tang/WireImage)

The constitutional change was brought about by former Prime Minister David Cameron, who insisted that the other 15 realms were on board with the drastic reform and change to tradition.

Mr Low writes: “Crucially, the palace was not against it. But they said that the government had to ensure the backing of the other 15 realms.”

A source is quoted as saying: “I always thought that the signals from Buckingham Palace were that if it was the wish of the duly elected prime minister of the day, and the realms can be sorted out, we will not stand in its way. I didn’t get the sense there was any great enthusiasm from the palace and the Queen herself.”

Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh with their great grandchildren. Pictured (left to right) Prince George, Prince Louis being held by Queen Elizabeth II, Savannah Phillips (standing at rear), Princess Charlotte, the Duke of Edinburgh, Isla Phillips holding Lena Tindall, and Mia Tindall
Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh with their great grandchildren. Pictured (left to right) Prince George, Prince Louis being held by Queen Elizabeth II, Savannah Phillips (standing at rear), Princess Charlotte, the Duke of Edinburgh, Isla Phillips holding Lena Tindall, and Mia Tindall(Image: PA)

King Charles was also interested in what the new reform would mean for the future of the monarchy, as he “ambushed” the permanent secretary at the Cabinet Office, with questions about the Act . He also expressed his disappointment that his eldest child, Prince William, wasn’t consulted in the matter.

The book reported that Charles wanted to know all about what would happen if William’s first child was a girl, especially with the planned Succession to the Crown Bill, as his main concern was whether the royal house name of Windsor could be changed if a granddaughter who became monarch married and took her husband’s name.

According to reports by Hello!, Charles gave an example and asked whether the house would continue being the House of Windsor or if it could become the House of Smith, if she married someone with this surname.

The explosive book also alleged that Charles was concerned about the monarchy if William’s first child was a daughter, who would later become a Queen, and she married a Catholic, given that the monarch is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

The rule change means Princess Charlotte remains ahead of her younger brother, Prince Louis, in the line of succession, as the children were born after the Act was introduced to impact those born after October 28th 2011.

This is unlike Princess Anne, who was overtaken by her younger siblings, Prince Andrew and Prince Edward.

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *